Now I can understand why the Argentines wanted to go home to Madonna during the filming of Evita!
What is the problem, I have no idea, because Evita is just another bad movie with one of our greatest actresses, Madonna. The problem is, this time she comes to sing singing sing for 2 1 / 2 hours - until she can sing to sing - sing until your ears bleed.
Evita was a long project and shabby cinema of the past, and it is easy to see why. The fact that Evita Argentina is making a mockery of the most beloved personalities, and the filmmakers wanted to shoot is almost a secondary issue. There is a problem that the film musicals tend to be a huge flop over the past 40 years, the problem of inability to act of Madonna; problem is that Eva Peron was basically an egomaniac who died 40 years ago, and that nobody in America I do not care anymore. And when the co-writer Oliver Stone may participate in the ... horror! You could also have been a musical called Oswald!
But it is not. Instead, Evita rumbles through the plot points, the life of Eva Peron in freight transport. Since the child's Stargazing slutty gold-digger and his wife actress less talented of the President, it's no wonder why Madonna fought so hard for this part - it's been out of her life (with the exception of the President of ... for now)! There is no functional need! And he gets to sing all the time!
And what does all this song, anyway? Yes, I know by Andrew Lloyd Webber (who, after seeing Cats, I think it is severely disturbed), and because of traditional musicals, Evita would be a prayer. But electric guitars and synthesizers? Discordant, headache-inducing songs? Capella sing a song about the dialogue between the characters? Sheesha, Evita is more than the WHO Tommy Singin 'in the Rain. (It is no surprise that director Alan Parker, he also created the Pink Floyd The Wall.), I half expected to start moving around with the Lady Ann-Margret beans.
No luck. Instead, we must listen to people like Antonio Banderas says the song, much like the cajon in a vise. Or very British Jonathan Pryce as Juan Peron (!) Sing about how he ran the British in Argentina. The hilarity of the two that are almost as much fun as the actual treatment of Evita: try to see how many ways Madonna can cover up her pregnancy bloom. How many weapons, hats, flowers and bouquets can it hold its size? A lot.
In all honesty, Banderas is a diamond in the rough here, the comedian, who is desperately serious between presentations. There are also some songs are tolerable, even in the mind, though they rarely make sense. But in the end, I have to pan Evita, if only because it's just stupid. And some parting words of Madonna, is a lyrical way, you might finally understand:
What is the problem, I have no idea, because Evita is just another bad movie with one of our greatest actresses, Madonna. The problem is, this time she comes to sing singing sing for 2 1 / 2 hours - until she can sing to sing - sing until your ears bleed.
Evita was a long project and shabby cinema of the past, and it is easy to see why. The fact that Evita Argentina is making a mockery of the most beloved personalities, and the filmmakers wanted to shoot is almost a secondary issue. There is a problem that the film musicals tend to be a huge flop over the past 40 years, the problem of inability to act of Madonna; problem is that Eva Peron was basically an egomaniac who died 40 years ago, and that nobody in America I do not care anymore. And when the co-writer Oliver Stone may participate in the ... horror! You could also have been a musical called Oswald!
But it is not. Instead, Evita rumbles through the plot points, the life of Eva Peron in freight transport. Since the child's Stargazing slutty gold-digger and his wife actress less talented of the President, it's no wonder why Madonna fought so hard for this part - it's been out of her life (with the exception of the President of ... for now)! There is no functional need! And he gets to sing all the time!
And what does all this song, anyway? Yes, I know by Andrew Lloyd Webber (who, after seeing Cats, I think it is severely disturbed), and because of traditional musicals, Evita would be a prayer. But electric guitars and synthesizers? Discordant, headache-inducing songs? Capella sing a song about the dialogue between the characters? Sheesha, Evita is more than the WHO Tommy Singin 'in the Rain. (It is no surprise that director Alan Parker, he also created the Pink Floyd The Wall.), I half expected to start moving around with the Lady Ann-Margret beans.
No luck. Instead, we must listen to people like Antonio Banderas says the song, much like the cajon in a vise. Or very British Jonathan Pryce as Juan Peron (!) Sing about how he ran the British in Argentina. The hilarity of the two that are almost as much fun as the actual treatment of Evita: try to see how many ways Madonna can cover up her pregnancy bloom. How many weapons, hats, flowers and bouquets can it hold its size? A lot.
In all honesty, Banderas is a diamond in the rough here, the comedian, who is desperately serious between presentations. There are also some songs are tolerable, even in the mind, though they rarely make sense. But in the end, I have to pan Evita, if only because it's just stupid. And some parting words of Madonna, is a lyrical way, you might finally understand:
0 comments:
Post a Comment